Establishing the existence of a legitimate business interest is the foundation to enforcing a restrictive covenant like a non-competition agreement. Fla. Stat. § 542.335 (“The person seeking enforcement of a restrictive covenant shall plead and prove the existence of one or more legitimate business interests justifying the restrictive covenant.”). The law imposes a burden to…
Continue reading ›It may be prudent to include a jury trial waiver in some business contracts. Contractual jury trial waivers are enforceable in Florida. Amquip Crane Rental, LLC v. Vercon Constr. Mgmt., Inc., 60 So. 3d 536 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) (stating a party “may waive its right to a jury trial if the waiver was entered…
Continue reading ›A litigant seeking to obtain an injunction usually has to prove it was irreparably harmed to obtain an injunction. Hollywood Towers Condo. Ass’n, Inc. v. Hampton, 40 So. 3d 784 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (“To obtain a permanent injunction, the petitioner must establish a clear legal right, an inadequate remedy at law and that irreparable…
Continue reading ›We recently wrote articles on a litigant’s ability to recover prevailing party attorney’s fees under the American Rule. The Rule prohibits attorney’s fees unless they are authorized by statutes or by a contract provision. Q.H. v. Sunshine State Health Plan, Inc., 305 So. 3d 543 (Fla. 4th DCA 2020) (“Under the American rule, a court…
Continue reading ›Restrictive covenants, such a non-compete and non-solicitation agreements, are important tools for businesses to protect their business interests. Restrictive covenants are enforceable if they are reasonable in time, geographic area, line of business, and supported by a “legitimate business interest.” Fla. Stat. § 542.335. Legitimate business interests can include protection of substantial relationships with specific…
Continue reading ›Recovering attorney’s fees is governed by the American Rule. This rule generally prohibits a party from recovering his or her attorney’s fees unless the fees are expressly permitted pursuant to a contract, statue, or rule. Q.H. v. Sunshine State Health Plan, Inc., 305 So. 3d 543 (Fla. 4th DCA 2020) (“Under the American rule, a…
Continue reading ›A plaintiff seeking permanent injunction must satisfy a four-factor test before a court can rule it is entitled to an injunction. A plaintiff must demonstrate: (1) that it has suffered an irreparable injury; (2) that remedies available at law, such as monetary damages, are inadequate to compensate for that injury; (3) that, considering the balance…
Continue reading ›A party seeking to enforce a restrictive covenant must plead and prove the existence of at least one legitimate business interest justifying enforcement of the restrictive covenant. Fla. Stat. § 542.335. That same party must also “plead and prove that the contractually specified restraint is reasonably necessary to protect the legitimate business interest or interests…
Continue reading ›Florida’s statute governing restrictive covenants requires the party trying to enforce the restrictive covenant to plead and prove the existence of at least one legitimate business interest justifying enforcement of that covenant. Fla. Stat. 542.355 (“The person seeking enforcement of a restrictive covenant shall plead and prove the existence of one or more legitimate business…
Continue reading ›Injunction are one possible remedy in business disputes. An injunction is an equitable remedy that requires a party to perform certain acts or prohibits a party from performing certain acts. “An injunction is for the most part preventive, and cannot ordinarily be employed to correct a wrong already done or restore to a party rights…
Continue reading ›
